Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 8

Media Agencies

Chapter 8 · pp. 235–252 · Mora Namdar, Mike Gonzalez

What this chapter is about

This chapter is in two parts, written by two different people. The first is about the radio and TV services America runs abroad. It says they should be joined up and watched more closely. The second is about public radio and television at home. It says the government should stop paying for them.

7 proposals indexed from this chapter.

The document says “must”Who acts: PresidentHow: internal managementIn: U.S. Agency for Global Media · Mora Namdarp. 241 in the PDF
What the document says

“These responsibilities must remain with the Department of Defense and the Office of Personnel Management”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 241

The chapter says the agency must never again be entrusted with delegated authority over its own personnel security programs and suitability determinations until it can prove past failures will not recur. Those responsibilities were transferred to Defense and the Office of Personnel Management in the final weeks of the Trump Administration.

What the document actually says

“These responsibilities must remain with the Department of Defense and the Office of Personnel Management”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 241
That sentence, in plain words

Two other agencies do these checks now. They must keep doing them.

What this is about

Staff at this agency must be vetted for security. The agency used to do that itself. The book says it did the job badly. It says other agencies should keep doing it.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. The memorandum of March 20, 2025 delegates to the Director of the Office of Personnel Management the authority to make final suitability determinations and take suitability actions on post-appointment conduct across the executive branch, and requires a rulemaking amending part 731 of title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations before that delegation takes effect. It centralizes one kind of decision at OPM, which runs in the same direction as the proposal, but it never mentions the U.S. Agency for Global Media, does not address that agency's delegated authority over its own personnel security program and suitability determinations, and does not touch the Defense Department's role in vetting its staff. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

The document says “should”Who acts: President, USAGMHow: internal managementIn: U.S. Agency for Global Media · Mora Namdarp. 242 in the PDF
What the document says

“Fiscal responsibility and transparency should return to the USAGM, with consolidation being a cornerstone of the strategy.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 242

The chapter says surplus services broadcasting in the same languages are often unnecessary and counterproductive, naming Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty in the surrounding passage, and makes consolidation the center of its approach.

What the document actually says

“Fiscal responsibility and transparency should return to the USAGM, with consolidation being a cornerstone of the strategy.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 242
That sentence, in plain words

Bring back careful spending here. Joining services together is the main way to do it.

What this is about

This agency runs several radio stations abroad. Some cover the same languages. The book says that is a waste. It wants them joined together.

What has happened
Same subject, different route

Continuing the Reduction of the Federal Bureaucracy

2025-03-14 · 90 FR 13043

Executive Order 14238 acts on the size of the same agency. It eliminates the non-statutory components and functions of the United States Agency for Global Media and reduces its statutory functions and personnel to the minimum required by law, which reaches the surplus services the chapter says are unnecessary. It goes a different way from the proposal. Consolidation, the cornerstone the chapter names, would merge overlapping foreign language broadcasting into fewer services, while the order cuts back across the agency without merging anything, names no service or language, and says nothing about the fiscal responsibility and transparency the chapter asks be restored.

In plain English

The order shrinks the same agency. It cuts as far as the law allows. The chapter wanted the many language services merged into fewer. The order merges nothing and names no service. It also says nothing about better spending and openness.

The document says “should”Who acts: PresidentHow: internal managementIn: U.S. Agency for Global Media · Mora Namdarp. 244 in the PDF
What the document says

“If VOA is not put in the direct chain of command under the NSC, serious consideration should be given to putting”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 244

Voice of America is the government's international broadcaster and operates under a firewall intended to protect journalistic independence. The chapter argues that firewall has been used without formal regulation to shirk oversight. It recalls that the service was under the direct supervision of the War and State Departments during the Cold War, and proposes putting it in the direct chain of command under the National Security Council, or else considering an alternative arrangement.

What the document actually says

“If VOA is not put in the direct chain of command under the NSC, serious consideration should be given to putting”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 244
That sentence, in plain words

Voice of America should report to the security team. If not, look at other ways.

What this is about

Voice of America is a radio service paid for by the government. It broadcasts to other countries. Rules keep politicians out of its news. The book says it should report to the White House security team instead.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Executive Order 14211, signed February 12, 2025, directs the Secretary of State to reform Foreign Service personnel practices so that officers faithfully implement the President's foreign policy. It concerns State Department staff, not Voice of America, and it creates no chain of command running through the National Security Council. The two Unified Command Plan memoranda among the candidates concern military combatant commands and have nothing to do with broadcasting. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

The document says “should”Who acts: President, CongressHow: legislationIn: U.S. Agency for Global Media · Mora Namdarp. 245 in the PDF
What the document says

“the USAGM should be defunded and disestablished.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 245

The chapter conditions this on the agency's aim remaining, in its words, to compete in foreign markets using anti-US talking points that parrot America's adversaries' propaganda, which it says would be an unacceptable burden on the taxpayer. It first asks for the agency to be reformed top to bottom with congressional and White House support.

What the document actually says

“the USAGM should be defunded and disestablished.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 245
That sentence, in plain words

If that does not change, close the agency and stop its money.

What this is about

The book first asks for this agency to be fixed. It says that must happen top to bottom. If it does not, the book says to shut it down.

What has happened
Partly matches

Continuing the Reduction of the Federal Bureaucracy

2025-03-14 · 90 FR 13043

Executive Order 14238 names the United States Agency for Global Media among seven entities whose non-statutory components and functions shall be eliminated to the maximum extent consistent with applicable law, and whose statutory functions and associated personnel shall be reduced to the minimum presence and function required by law, with the Office of Management and Budget directed to reject funding requests inconsistent with that. That is the defunding the chapter contemplates, done by executive order. It does not disestablish the agency, which was created by statute and would take an act of Congress, and it is not conditional in the way the chapter's recommendation is: the chapter asks first for reform top to bottom and would defund only if the agency's aim did not change, while the order sets no condition and gives no reason tied to what the agency broadcasts.

In plain English

The order cuts the broadcast agency to the least the law allows. Its funding requests are to be turned down. But it is not shut down, which would take an act of Congress. And the chapter would have cut it only if reform failed first.

The document says “must”Who acts: President, CongressHow: legislationIn: Corporation for Public Broadcasting · Mike Gonzalezp. 246 in the PDF
What the document says

“the next conservative President must finally get this done and do it despite opposition from congressional members of his own party if necessary. To stop public funding is good policy and good politics.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 246

The chapter argues that the government is heavily in debt, that it should not compel what it calls the conservative half of the country to pay for the suppression of its own views, and quotes Jefferson on compelled contributions. It says stopping public funding must be done even over opposition from the President's own party in Congress.

What the document actually says

“the next conservative President must finally get this done and do it despite opposition from congressional members of his own party if necessary. To stop public funding is good policy and good politics.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 246
That sentence, in plain words

The next president must get this done. He should do it even if his own party fights him.

What this is about

Public radio and television get money from the government. The book says that should stop. It says the president should push it through. It says he should do so even if his own party says no.

What has happened
Partly matches

Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Biased Media

2025-05-01 · 90 FR 19415

Executive Order 14290, signed May 1, 2025, instructs the Corporation for Public Broadcasting Board to cancel direct funding to NPR and PBS to the maximum extent allowed by law and to decline future funding, to revise the 2025 Community Service Grants provisions so station grantees cannot pass federal money to either, and directs every agency to identify and terminate its own direct or indirect funding of the two. Where it falls short of the proposal: it does not end public funding of the Corporation itself. The Corporation's appropriation is made by Congress and the order leaves it standing, directing only where the money may go once received. The chapter asks the President to stop the funding even over opposition in his own party in Congress, which is a legislative act the order does not perform.

In plain English

The order tells the public media board to cut off two networks. Stations may not pass federal money to them either. But the board's own funding stays. Congress votes that money, and the order only steers where it goes.

The document says “should”Who acts: CongressHow: legislationIn: Corporation for Public Broadcasting · Mike Gonzalezp. 247 in the PDF
What the document says

“This special budgetary treatment is unjustified and should be ended.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 247

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting receives appropriations two years in advance, which the chapter says insulates it from Congress's power of the purse and from oversight. It notes a request for a $565 million advance appropriation, a $40 million increase on the previous year.

What the document actually says

“This special budgetary treatment is unjustified and should be ended.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 247
That sentence, in plain words

This special money deal is not fair. It should end.

What this is about

Most agencies get their money one year at a time. This one gets it two years ahead. The book says that shields it from Congress. It says the practice should end.

What has happened
Partly matches

To rescind certain budget authority proposed to be rescinded in special messages transmitted to the Congress by the President on June 3, 2025, in accordance with section 1012(a) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974

2025-07-24 · 139 Stat. 467

The Rescissions Act of 2025 rescinds the amounts made available for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting for fiscal year 2026 by Public Law 118-47 and for fiscal year 2027 by Public Law 119-4. Those are the advance appropriations the chapter objects to, and Congress canceled them instead of letting them stand beyond its reach, which is the oversight point the chapter makes. It ends two particular advance appropriations, not the practice. No provision changes the authority under which the Corporation is funded two years ahead, so a later appropriation could be made the same way. The two paragraphs name no dollar figure, and the laws they reach into are not indexed on this site, so the amounts rescinded are not recorded here.

In plain English

The 2025 rescissions law cancels money set aside for public broadcasting for 2026 and 2027. Those are the early grants the chapter objects to. But it ends two grants, not the practice. Nothing stops Congress from funding the same way two years ahead again.

The document says “should”Who acts: President, FCCHow: regulationIn: Corporation for Public Broadcasting · Mike Gonzalezp. 247 in the PDF
What the document says

“They should no longer, for example, be qualified as noncommercial education stations (NCE stations)”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 247

Noncommercial educational status gives stations reserved places on the broadcast spectrum. The chapter says NPR, Pacifica and the other radio ventures have no claim on an educational function, and that the President should instruct the Federal Communications Commission to exclude stations affiliated with PBS and NPR from that category.

What the document actually says

“They should no longer, for example, be qualified as noncommercial education stations (NCE stations)”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 247
That sentence, in plain words

These stations count as school stations. The book says they should not.

What this is about

Some stations are marked as school stations. That gives them reserved space on the airwaves. The book says these no longer teach. It says they should lose that status.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Executive Order 14290 is the nearest document, and it cuts off federal funding to NPR and PBS. It says nothing about the Federal Communications Commission or the noncommercial educational class of license, which reserves places on the broadcast spectrum and is what the proposal asks be withdrawn from stations affiliated with PBS and NPR. No indexed document directs the Commission to reclassify those stations. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mora Namdar and Mike Gonzalez, “Media Agencies,” in Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), pp. 235-252.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Media Agencies,” Project 2025, chapter 8. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/chapter-8/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

What This Page Covers, and What It Leaves Out

Recommendations from both parts of the chapter. Each proposal records which part it comes from and who wrote it, because the two parts are separately authored and address different agencies.

The chapter's account of past management failures at the broadcasting agency, and its criticizm of specific programs and coverage.

The two parts of this chapter are by different authors and should not be read as a single argument. Proposals here are attributed to the part they appear in.