Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 1 › Proposal

Presidential Personnel should plan for tools such as Schedule F

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 1, p. 32. Written by Rick Dearborn.

Presidential Personnel should plan for tools such as Schedule F

The document says “is responsible for”Who acts: Office of Presidential PersonnelHow: internal managementp. 32 in the PDF
What the document says

“Identifying programmatic political workforce needs early and developing plans (for example, Schedule F).”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 32

In its list of the Office of Presidential Personnel's responsibilities, the chapter includes identifying political workforce needs early and developing plans, giving Schedule F as its example. Schedule F is the subject of a separate proposal in chapter 3, which asks for the 2020 order creating it to be reinstated.

What the document actually says

“Identifying programmatic political workforce needs early and developing plans (for example, Schedule F).”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 32
That sentence, in plain words

Work out early what political staff are needed, and make plans, such as Schedule F.

What this is about

One White House office picks people for government jobs. The chapter lists what that office should do. One item is planning ahead for tools like Schedule F. Schedule F would make some workers much easier to fire.

What has happened
Partly matches

Creating Schedule G in the Excepted Service

2025-07-17 · 90 FR 34753

Executive Order 14317 creates Schedule G of the excepted service for noncareer positions of a policy-making or policy-advocating character, which is the kind of political workforce tool the passage has the Office of Presidential Personnel planning for, and the order's definition section ties the covered positions to those whose appointment requires the assent of that office. The fit breaks down in three places: the passage asks for a planning practice inside Presidential Personnel rather than a new schedule, Schedule G is a different schedule from the Schedule F the passage gives as its example, and the order's instructions on making Schedule G appointments run only to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

In plain English

An order of 2025 creates a new job class, Schedule G. It covers policy jobs that are not career posts, the kind of tool the passage has in mind. But the passage asked for planning inside the staffing office, not a new class. Schedule G is not Schedule F, and the order's steps run only to one agency.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 32.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Presidential Personnel should plan for tools such as Schedule F,” Project 2025, chapter 1, p. 32. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch01-ppo-schedule-f-planning/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →