Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 2 › Proposal

Send significant guidance documents through regulatory review

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 2, p. 49. Written by Russ Vought.

Send significant guidance documents through regulatory review

The document says “should”Who acts: PresidentHow: executive orderp. 49 in the PDF
What the document says

“The next President should also revive the directive in Executive Order 13891 that significant guidance documents also must pass through OIRA review.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 49

Guidance documents are agency statements that are not formal regulations but shape how rules are applied. The chapter says the next President should revive the requirement, from Executive Order 13891, that significant guidance also pass through OIRA review.

What the document actually says

“The next President should also revive the directive in Executive Order 13891 that significant guidance documents also must pass through OIRA review.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 49
That sentence, in plain words

The next president should bring back the rule that big guidance papers must be checked too.

What this is about

Agencies write papers that are not full rules. They still tell people what to do. The book says these should be checked by the White House first.

What has happened
Partly matches

Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's "Department of Government Efficiency" Deregulatory Initiative

2025-02-19 · 90 FR 10583

Executive Order 14219 puts guidance documents inside the definition of regulation for the purposes of the order, and then directs in section 4 that agencies continue to follow the processes set out in Executive Order 12866 for submitting regulations to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs and consult that office on potential new regulations, which is the substance of what the passage asks for. The fit breaks down because the order does not revive Executive Order 13891, which was revoked in 2021 and stays revoked, and so does not restore that order's separate machinery for significant guidance, including the agency guidance portals and the notice and comment step. It also takes its definition of guidance document from Executive Order 13422 rather than from 13891, and it exempts military, national security, homeland security, foreign affairs and immigration functions along with anything the Director of the Office of Management and Budget chooses to exempt.

In plain English

The order counts guidance as a rule, so guidance goes to the White House for review. That is the heart of what the chapter asked. But the old order it wanted revived stays dead, along with its web lists and comment step. Whole fields are also left out.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 49.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Send significant guidance documents through regulatory review,” Project 2025, chapter 2, p. 49. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch02-guidance-through-oira/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →