Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 2 › Proposal

Review every general and flag officer promotion at the White House

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 2, p. 52. Written by Russ Vought.

Review every general and flag officer promotion at the White House

The document says “should”Who acts: NSCHow: internal managementp. 52 in the PDF
What the document says

“The NSC should rigorously review all general and flag officer promotions to prioritize the core roles and responsibilities of the military over social engineering and non-defense matters”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 52

The chapter says the National Security Council should rigorously review all general and flag officer promotions, in order to prioritize the military's core roles over what it calls social engineering and non-defense matters, listing climate change, critical race theory and manufactured extremism among the policies it says weaken the armed forces.

What the document actually says

“The NSC should rigorously review all general and flag officer promotions to prioritize the core roles and responsibilities of the military over social engineering and non-defense matters”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 52
That sentence, in plain words

The council should check every top officer picked to lead. Fighting should count first, not other aims.

What this is about

The military picks its own top officers. The book says the White House should check each choice. It wants officers judged on fighting ability. It names climate change and race training as things to weigh against.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Executive Order 14356 requires each agency to set up a Strategic Hiring Committee to approve every vacancy and to file annual staffing plans, which is a form of central review of who is appointed, but section 3 exempts military personnel of the Armed Forces outright. No candidate gives the National Security Council or any other White House body a role in reviewing general and flag officer promotions. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 52.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Review every general and flag officer promotion at the White House,” Project 2025, chapter 2, p. 52. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch02-nsc-review-of-officer-promotions/ (retrieved October 8, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →