Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 2 › Proposal

Extend White House regulatory review to independent agencies

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 2, p. 49. Written by Russ Vought.

Extend White House regulatory review to independent agencies

The document says “should”Who acts: President, OMBHow: executive orderp. 49 in the PDF
What the document says

“Regulatory analysis and OIRA review should also be required of the historically “independent” agencies as the Office of Legal Counsel has found is legally permissible.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 49

Independent agencies, such as the financial and communications regulators, have not generally submitted their rules to White House review. The chapter says regulatory analysis and OIRA review should be required of them too, citing an Office of Legal Counsel finding that this is legally permissible. It puts the word independent in quotation marks.

What the document actually says

“Regulatory analysis and OIRA review should also be required of the historically “independent” agencies as the Office of Legal Counsel has found is legally permissible.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 49
That sentence, in plain words

These agencies should have to send their rules to the White House for review too.

What this is about

Some agencies have long been kept apart from the White House. They write rules without sending them over first. The book says they should have to send them. It says a legal office has said this is allowed.

What has happened
Closely matches

Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies

2025-02-18 · 90 FR 10447

Section 1 states that all executive departments and agencies, including so-called independent agencies, shall submit for review all proposed and final significant regulatory actions to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs before publication in the Federal Register, and section 3 amends the definition of agency in Executive Order 12866 to reach any agency under 44 U.S.C. 3502(1) plus the Federal Election Commission. That is the extension of White House regulatory review the passage asks for, applied to the same class of agencies. The fit is not complete: the order exempts the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open Market Committee in the conduct of monetary policy, reaching the Board only on its supervision and regulation of financial institutions; it covers significant regulatory actions rather than the regulatory analysis the passage also names; and it cites no Office of Legal Counsel finding, which is the authority the passage rests the proposal on.

In plain English

The order makes so-called independent agencies send big rules to the White House first. That is the review the chapter asked for. But the Fed is left out for its money work. And the order rests on no legal finding, which the chapter had leaned on.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 49.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Extend White House regulatory review to independent agencies,” Project 2025, chapter 2, p. 49. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch02-oira-review-of-independent-agencies/ (retrieved October 8, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →