Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 2 › Proposal

Rewrite the environmental review rules and ban cumulative impact analysis

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 2, p. 60. Written by Russ Vought.

Rewrite the environmental review rules and ban cumulative impact analysis

The document says “should”Who acts: President, CEQHow: regulationp. 60 in the PDF
What the document says

“The President should instruct the CEQ to rewrite its regulations implementing NEPA along the lines of the historic 2020 effort and restoring its key provisions such as banning the use of cumulative impact analysis.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 60

The National Environmental Policy Act requires environmental review before major federal actions. The chapter says the President should have the Council on Environmental Quality rewrite its rules along the lines of the 2020 revision, restoring the ban on cumulative impact analysis, and should frame the new rules to limit the scope for judicial review of agency environmental analysis and the remedies available.

What the document actually says

“The President should instruct the CEQ to rewrite its regulations implementing NEPA along the lines of the historic 2020 effort and restoring its key provisions such as banning the use of cumulative impact analysis.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 60
That sentence, in plain words

The president should have this office rewrite the rules on environmental checks. It should go back to the 2020 version. That version banned adding up effects over time.

What this is about

Big projects must be checked for harm to the environment first. One rule made agencies add up harm from many sources together. The book wants that rule dropped. It also wants courts to have less say.

What has happened
Partly matches

Removal of National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Regulations

2025-02-25 · 90 FR 10610

The Council on Environmental Quality acted on its National Environmental Policy Act regulations, as the proposal asks, and did so at the President's instruction: Executive Order 14154 directed the Chairman to issue guidance and propose rescinding the regulations, and this interim final rule removes 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508 from the Code of Federal Regulations. The fit breaks down on how. The passage asks for a rewrite along the lines of the 2020 revision, restoring provisions such as the ban on weighing cumulative impacts; the rule writes no new provisions at all, so that requirement disappears with the rest of the regulations rather than being replaced by a rule banning it, and the substantive text moves to agency-level procedures issued separately by the Interior, Energy and Agriculture Departments and others. The rule also does not address the two further things the passage asks the new regulations to do, limiting the scope of judicial review of an agency's environmental review and limiting the remedies available.

In plain English

The council wiped out its own environment rules, as the President had told it to. The chapter asked for a rewrite that would ban one kind of study. Nothing new was written, so that ban was not written either. Each agency now sets its own steps instead.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 60.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Rewrite the environmental review rules and ban cumulative impact analysis,” Project 2025, chapter 2, p. 60. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch02-rewrite-nepa-regulations/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →