Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 3 › Proposal

Build policy goals into career employees' performance appraisals

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 3, p. 74. Written by Donald Devine, Dennis Dean Kirk, Paul Dans.

Build policy goals into career employees' performance appraisals

The document says “is essential”Who acts: political appointeesHow: internal managementp. 74 in the PDF
What the document says

“It is essential that political executives build policy goals directly into employee appraisals both for mission success and for employees to know what is expected.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 74

Political executives should write policy goals into the performance appraisals of career staff, take an active part in supervising those appraisals rather than delegating them to senior career managers, and reward good performers.

What the document actually says

“It is essential that political executives build policy goals directly into employee appraisals both for mission success and for employees to know what is expected.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 74
That sentence, in plain words

The president's appointees must put his goals right into workers' job reviews. That helps the work get done. It also lets workers know what is expected.

What this is about

Job reviews say how well a worker did. The book says the president's own goals should be written into those reviews. It says this tells workers what is expected of them. It also says the president's appointees should run the reviews themselves.

What has happened
Partly matches

Restoring Accountability for Career Senior Executives

2025-01-20 · 90 FR 8481

The chapter asks that political executives build policy goals into employee appraisals and supervise those appraisals themselves rather than delegating them. The memorandum puts political appointees in control of the bodies that run senior executive appraisal: clause (d) reconstitutes each agency's Executive Resources Board with senior noncareer officials as a majority, and clause (e) reconstitutes the Performance Review Boards. Two differences. The performance plans themselves are issued centrally by OPM and OMB for agencies to adopt, rather than written by political executives at each agency as the chapter describes. And the memorandum reaches only the Senior Executive Service, while the chapter speaks of employee appraisals without that limit.

In plain English

The book asked that political aides write policy goals into staff reviews. It also asked that they run those reviews. The memo puts such aides in charge of the boards that run senior reviews. But the review plans come from two central offices for agencies to adopt. And the memo covers only senior staff, while the book spoke of all staff.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 74.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Build policy goals into career employees' performance appraisals,” Project 2025, chapter 3, p. 74. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch03-appraisals-carry-policy-goals/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →