Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 3 › Proposal

End or narrow the disparate impact doctrine

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 3, p. 72. Written by Donald Devine, Dennis Dean Kirk, Paul Dans.

End or narrow the disparate impact doctrine

The document says “could”Who acts: Congress, PresidentHow: legislation or regulationp. 72 in the PDF
What the document says

“This doctrine of disparate impact could be ended legislatively or at least narrowed through the regulatory process by a future Administration.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 72

Stated as a possibility rather than a recommendation: that the disparate impact doctrine, which the chapter describes as treating test results suggestive of discrimination as actionable without evidence of intent, could be ended by legislation or narrowed by regulation.

What the document actually says

“This doctrine of disparate impact could be ended legislatively or at least narrowed through the regulatory process by a future Administration.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 72
That sentence, in plain words

Congress could end this rule by passing a law. Or a future president could at least shrink it by changing the rules.

What this is about

One rule says a test can be unfair even when no one meant it to be. It looks at who passes, not at what was meant. The book says a future president could shrink this rule. Congress could end it. The book lists this as something that could happen. It does not ask for it.

What has happened
Closely matches

Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy

2025-04-23 · 90 FR 17537

The chapter raised ending or narrowing disparate impact as a possibility rather than a recommendation: 'could be ended legislatively or at least narrowed through the regulatory process'. This order acts by the executive route on the narrower of the two. The chapter's framing was conditional, so a reader should not treat this as an implemented plank.

In plain English

The chapter only raised this as an option, not a call to act. It said the rule could be ended by law or narrowed by an agency. The order takes the second path. Because the chapter was tentative, this is not a plank carried out.

What cites those orders

34 agency rules

22 more not listed here.

Each of these names the order above in its own summary, preamble or filing. That is a fact about the document, not a finding that it carries out this proposal: it is one step further away than the order is, and what it does about the proposal is a reading nobody has made here.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 72.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “End or narrow the disparate impact doctrine,” Project 2025, chapter 3, p. 72. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch03-narrow-disparate-impact/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →