Read theMandate

Project 2025Chapter 3 › Proposal

Reintroduce the 2018 order on removal and performance procedures

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 3, p. 73. Written by Donald Devine, Dennis Dean Kirk, Paul Dans.

Reintroduce the 2018 order on removal and performance procedures

The document says “will need toWho acts: PresidentHow: executive orderp. 73 in the PDF
What the document says

“Unfortunately, the order was overturned by the Biden Administration, so it will need to be reintroduced in 2025.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 73

The chapter lists the requirements of Executive Order 13839: shortening the time allowed for an employee to improve before corrective action, initiating discipline more expeditiously, shortening the time to respond to allegations of poor performance, reminding supervisors of expiring probationary periods, barring settlement agreements that alter a personnel record, and re-examining discipline of supervisors who retaliate against whistleblowers. It says the order will need to be reintroduced in 2025.

What the document actually says

“Unfortunately, the order was overturned by the Biden Administration, so it will need to be reintroduced in 2025.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 73
That sentence, in plain words

Sadly, the Biden team cancelled this order. So it will have to be made again in 2025.

What this is about

A 2018 order made it faster to fire workers who do poor work. It cut the time they get to fix their work. It also stopped deals that wipe bad marks off a worker's record. President Biden undid that order. The book says the next president needs to bring it back.

What has happened
Partly matches

Strengthening Probationary Periods in the Federal Service

2025-04-24 · 90 FR 17729

Shares the chapter's subject of removing poor performers, and the chapter's list of Executive Order 13839's requirements includes reminding supervisors of expiring probationary periods. This order goes further than that item by making tenure conditional on affirmative agency certification, which the chapter did not propose.

Share this page

How to read this page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →