Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 3 › Proposal

Restore general ability testing for federal hiring

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 3, p. 73. Written by Donald Devine, Dennis Dean Kirk, Paul Dans.

Restore general ability testing for federal hiring

The document says “must”Who acts: OPMHow: regulationp. 73 in the PDF
What the document says

“A government that is unable to select employees based on KSA-like test qualifications cannot work, and the OPM must move forward on this very basic personnel management obligation.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 73

The chapter recounts the end of the Professional and Administrative Career Examination under a 1981 consent decree and says courts have agreed to review that decree if the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures are reformed. It states that OPM must move forward on selecting employees by knowledge, skills and abilities testing. It separately says the disparate impact doctrine could be ended legislatively or narrowed through the regulatory process.

What the document actually says

“A government that is unable to select employees based on KSA-like test qualifications cannot work, and the OPM must move forward on this very basic personnel management obligation.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 73
That sentence, in plain words

A government that cannot pick workers by testing what they know and can do will not work. OPM must get moving on this basic job.

What this is about

The government used to give a test to people who wanted jobs. A court case ended that test in 1981. The book says the government cannot work well if it cannot test people. It says OPM must find a way to test them again.

What has happened
Partly matches

Reforming the Federal Hiring Process and Restoring Merit to Government Service

2025-01-20 · 90 FR 8621

Addresses merit hiring and candidate assessment, which is the subject of the chapter's proposal. The chapter's specific ask was that OPM restore testing on knowledge, skills and abilities against the 1981 consent decree and the Uniform Guidelines; whether the hiring plan does that is not established by the order alone.

In plain English

The order deals with merit hiring and how job seekers are tested. That is the book's subject. The book asked that tests of knowledge and skill come back under set rules. Whether the new hiring plan does that cannot be told from the order alone.

What cites those orders

2 agency rules

Each of these names the order above in its own summary, preamble or filing. That is a fact about the document, not a finding that it carries out this proposal: it is one step further away than the order is, and what it does about the proposal is a reading nobody has made here.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 73.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Restore general ability testing for federal hiring,” Project 2025, chapter 3, p. 73. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch03-restore-ksa-testing/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →