Penalise sanctuary jurisdictions financially
What the document says“Congress should require compliance with immigration detainers to the maximum extent consistent with the Tenth Amendment and set financial disincentives for jurisdictions that implement either official or unofficial sanctuary policies.”
A detainer is a request from ICE that a local jail hold someone past their release date. The chapter asks Congress to require compliance as far as the Tenth Amendment allows and to set financial penalties for places with official or unofficial sanctuary policies. It also asks Congress to authorize state and local police to take part in immigration enforcement.
What the document actually says“Congress should require compliance with immigration detainers to the maximum extent consistent with the Tenth Amendment and set financial disincentives for jurisdictions that implement either official or unofficial sanctuary policies.”
Make local jails hold people for ICE. Cut money to the places that refuse.
ICE can ask a local jail to hold someone. Some cities refuse to do it. The book says the law should make them. It says those that refuse should lose money.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.