Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 6 › Proposal

Accept all political ambassadors' resignations and review career ones

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 6, p. 174. Written by Kiron K. Skinner.

Accept all political ambassadors' resignations and review career ones

The document says “should”Who acts: President, Secretary of StateHow: internal managementp. 174 in the PDF
What the document says

“It should both accept the resignations of all political ambassadors and quickly review and reassess all career ambassadors.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 174

The chapter notes that previous Administrations accepted only political ambassadors' resignations and let career ambassadors stay on, sometimes for years. It says the review should begin well before the first day, and separately that ambassadors in countries where policy would substantially change, or who have shown hostility to the incoming Administration, should be recalled immediately.

What the document actually says

“It should both accept the resignations of all political ambassadors and quickly review and reassess all career ambassadors.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 174
That sentence, in plain words

Let all the political ambassadors go. Then look hard at the career ones too.

What this is about

Ambassadors speak for the country abroad. Some are political picks. Others are career staff. The book says the political ones should all go. It says the career ones should be reviewed.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. The Office of Personnel Management rule lets agencies move policy-influencing career positions into Schedule Policy/Career, making them removable without adverse action procedures. It is a government-wide civil service rule and does not touch ambassadors: nothing in it accepts the resignations of political ambassadors or requires a review of career ones. No document indexed here mentions ambassadors. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 174.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Accept all political ambassadors' resignations and review career ones,” Project 2025, chapter 6, p. 174. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch06-review-all-ambassadors/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →