Read theMandate

Project 2025Chapter 11 › Proposal

Stop investigating civil rights cases based on disparate impact

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 11, p. 335. Written by Lindsey M. Burke.

Stop investigating civil rights cases based on disparate impact

The document says “shouldWho acts: Department of Education, DOJHow: regulationp. 335 in the PDF
What the document says

“the new Administration should also direct the department and DOJ jointly to issue enforcement guidance stating that the agencies will no longer investigate Title VI cases that exclusively rest on allegations of disparate impact.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 335

Title VI bars discrimination on grounds of race, color or national origin in federally funded programs. Disparate impact refers to a policy that produces unequal outcomes without discriminatory intent. The chapter says sweeping action is needed so that the purpose of the Civil Rights Act is not inverted through a disparate impact standard, and asks for a regulation clarifying the point.

What the document actually says

“the new Administration should also direct the department and DOJ jointly to issue enforcement guidance stating that the agencies will no longer investigate Title VI cases that exclusively rest on allegations of disparate impact.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 335
That sentence, in plain words

Tell both agencies to drop these cases. They rest only on who ends up worse off.

What this is about

A school rule can hit one group harder than others. That can count as discrimination even if it was not meant. The book says such cases should not be looked into.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to read this page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →