Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 11 › Proposal

Restore the previous Title IX rule and define sex as biological

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 11, p. 334. Written by Lindsey M. Burke.

Restore the previous Title IX rule and define sex as biological

The document says “should”Who acts: President, Department of EducationHow: regulationp. 334 in the PDF
What the document says

“On its first day in office, the next Administration should signal its intent to enter the rulemaking process to restore the Trump”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 334

The full passage asks the next Administration to signal on day one its intent to restore the Trump Administration's Title IX regulation, with the additional insistence that sex is properly understood as a fixed biological fact, and to post notice-and-comment immediately. The chapter also asks for a full review of Title IX investigations conducted on the understanding that sex referred to gender identity or sexual orientation, for all such ongoing investigations to be dropped, and for affected districts to be told they may drop policy changes made under pressure.

What the document actually says

“On its first day in office, the next Administration should signal its intent to enter the rulemaking process to restore the Trump”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 334
That sentence, in plain words

On day one, say that the old rule will be brought back.

What this is about

Title IX is a law about sex discrimination at school. Rules under it were changed. The book wants the earlier rules back. It says sex should mean the sex a person was born as.

What has happened
Partly matches

Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government

2025-01-20 · 90 FR 8615

Executive Order 14168 supplies the definitional half of what the chapter asks. It defines sex as an individual's immutable biological classification as either male or female, states that the definition shall govern all executive interpretation and application of federal law, directs the Attorney General to issue guidance correcting the application of Bostock v. Clayton County to sex based distinctions in agency activities, naming Title IX as the example, and rescinds the Education Department's Title IX guidance documents, including the 2024 implementation pointers and the 2021 enforcement guidance on sexual orientation and gender identity. It changes no regulation. The Title IX rule itself is untouched, no rulemaking is begun, and the order says nothing about reviewing or dropping investigations conducted on the earlier understanding.

In plain English

The order fixes the meaning of sex as male or female for all federal law. It tells the Attorney General to guide agencies on a court ruling, naming school sex bias law. It also pulls school guidance papers from 2021 and 2024. But no rule is changed and none is begun. Open cases are not addressed.

Partly matches

Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports

2025-02-05 · 90 FR 9279

Section 3(a)(i) of Executive Order 14201 directs the Secretary of Education, in coordination with the Attorney General, to continue to comply with the vacatur of the rule Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance of April 29, 2024, and to take other appropriate action to ensure that regulation does not have effect, and section 3(a)(ii) directs that regulations and policy guidance be brought into line with the statutory demand for equal athletic opportunity for members of both sexes. The rule the chapter would displace is therefore treated as having no effect. The route is not the one asked for. Nothing here opens a notice and comment rulemaking to restore the 2020 regulation, the action rests on a court's vacatur rather than on the department's own rulemaking, the order's subject is athletics rather than the whole regulation, and instead of dropping investigations opened on a gender identity reading of Title IX it directs new enforcement actions.

In plain English

The order treats the 2024 school rule as dead, and points at sports. The chapter asked the agency to write a new rule the slow public way. That is not done here. The order leans on a court ruling instead, and it calls for more cases, not fewer.

What cites those orders

12 agency rules

Each of these names the order above in its own summary, preamble or filing. That is a fact about the document, not a finding that it carries out this proposal: it is one step further away than the order is, and what it does about the proposal is a reading nobody has made here.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 334.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Restore the previous Title IX rule and define sex as biological,” Project 2025, chapter 11, p. 334. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch11-restore-trump-title-ix/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →