Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 12 › Proposal

Eliminate the department's applied energy programs

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 12, p. 374. Written by Bernard L. McNamee.

Eliminate the department's applied energy programs

The document says “should”Who acts: Congress, PresidentHow: legislationp. 374 in the PDF
What the document says

“The next Administration should work with Congress to eliminate all DOE applied energy programs including OE”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 374

The chapter repeats this proposal office by office, asking for the elimination of the offices covering electricity, fossil energy and carbon management, nuclear energy and energy efficiency and renewable energy. It says taxpayer dollars should not subsidize preferred businesses and energy resources, which it says distorts the market and undermines reliability. It allows a possible exception for work related to basic science for new energy technology.

What the document actually says

“The next Administration should work with Congress to eliminate all DOE applied energy programs including OE”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 374
That sentence, in plain words

Work with Congress to close these energy programs. All of them.

What this is about

The department runs programs that help bring energy technology to market. The book says private firms should do that. It wants the programs closed.

What has happened
Same subject, different route

Making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes

2026-01-23 · 140 Stat. 5

Public Law 119-74, enacted January 23, 2026, acts on the same offices the passage names and funds them. Title III appropriates $3,100,000,000 under the heading Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, $235,000,000 under Electricity, $1,785,000,000 under Nuclear Energy and $720,000,000 under Fossil Energy, each for fiscal year 2026 and each to remain available until expended. The passage asks Congress to eliminate those applied energy programs. The fit breaks down in that an appropriations act does not decide whether an office continues to exist: it neither creates nor abolishes any of these offices, it sets amounts for a single fiscal year, and it says nothing about the exception for basic science research the chapter allows.

In plain English

A law of January 23, 2026 funds the same energy offices the passage would close. It gives $3.1 billion for one, $235 million for another, and more for nuclear and coal work. But a spending law does not decide if an office lives on. It sets sums for one year and ends nothing.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 374.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Eliminate the department's applied energy programs,” Project 2025, chapter 12, p. 374. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch12-eliminate-applied-energy-programs/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →