Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 12 › Proposal

Eliminate ARPA-E

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 12, p. 385. Written by Bernard L. McNamee.

Eliminate ARPA-E

The document says “should”Who acts: Congress, PresidentHow: legislationp. 385 in the PDF
What the document says

“Eliminate ARPA-E. The next Administration should work with Congress to eliminate ARPA–E.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 385

The chapter says the agency is unnecessary, risks taxpayer dollars and interferes with risk-benefit decisions that should be made by the private sector. ARPA-E funds early-stage energy research thought too risky for private investment.

What the document actually says

“Eliminate ARPA-E. The next Administration should work with Congress to eliminate ARPA–E.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 385
That sentence, in plain words

Close ARPA-E. The next team should work with Congress to end it.

What this is about

ARPA-E pays for risky energy research. The idea is that firms will not fund it. The book says that is not the government's job.

What has happened
Same subject, different route

Making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes

2026-01-23 · 140 Stat. 5

Public Law 119-74 appropriates $350,000,000 under the heading Advanced Research Projects Agency, Energy for the activities authorized by section 5012 of the America COMPETES Act, of which $40,000,000 is available until September 30, 2027 for program direction. The passage asks Congress to eliminate that agency, and the act instead names it and funds it for fiscal year 2026. The fit breaks down in that the act carries no provision addressing whether the agency should continue, repeals no part of its authorizing statute, and reaches only one fiscal year, so it records a funding decision rather than a decision on the agency's existence.

In plain English

The same 2026 spending law gives $350 million to the energy research agency the passage would close. It names the agency and funds it for one year. But the law says nothing about whether the agency should go on. It repeals no part of the law that set it up.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 385.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Eliminate ARPA-E,” Project 2025, chapter 12, p. 385. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch12-eliminate-arpa-e/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →