Open the agency's science to public scrutiny
What the document says“EPA should embrace so-called citizen science and deputize the public to subject the agency’s science to greater scrutiny”
The chapter names data analysis, identification of scientific flaws and research misconduct as the areas where it wants greater public scrutiny. It contrasts this with what it calls scaremongering risk communications and enforcement activities. The chapter separately lists making all supporting studies public and open to comment among its principles.
What the document actually says“EPA should embrace so-called citizen science and deputize the public to subject the agency’s science to greater scrutiny”
Let the public check the agency's science. Ask them to look for mistakes.
The EPA uses science to set rules. The book says the public should be able to check it. It wants people to look for errors.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.