Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 13 › Proposal

Apply the day one regulatory freeze to the EPA without exception

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 13, p. 436. Written by Mandy M. Gunasekara.

Apply the day one regulatory freeze to the EPA without exception

The document says “should”Who acts: PresidentHow: executive orderp. 436 in the PDF
What the document says

“The new President’s Inauguration Day regulatory review/freeze directives should avoid exceptions for EPA actions.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 436

The chapter says the freeze should explicitly include quasi-regulatory actions such as assessments, determinations, standards and guidance that have not gone through notice and comment, and which it says may date back years.

What the document actually says

“The new President’s Inauguration Day regulatory review/freeze directives should avoid exceptions for EPA actions.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 436
That sentence, in plain words

A new president freezes new rules on day one. The EPA should get no exception.

What this is about

A new president usually pauses new rules on day one. Agencies sometimes get let off. The book says the EPA should not be.

What has happened
Closely matches

Regulatory Freeze Pending Review

2025-01-20 · 90 FR 8249

The memorandum of January 20, 2025 freezes rulemaking across all executive departments and agencies, with no exception for the EPA, and its definition of rule goes well beyond notice and comment rulemaking: it reaches guidance documents, notices of inquiry, advance notices, proposed rules, and any agency statement of general applicability and future effect that sets out a policy or an interpretation. That covers the quasi-regulatory actions the chapter names. The fit is not exact. The freeze bars new rules and asks agencies only to consider postponing rules already published, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget may exempt any rule deemed necessary for emergencies or other urgent circumstances, and nothing in it reaches back to assessments, determinations or standards issued in earlier years.

In plain English

The memo freezes new rules at every agency. The EPA gets no carve out. Its meaning of rule is broad and takes in guidance and notices, so it covers the acts the book names. But it only asks that agencies weigh delay for rules already out. The budget chief may exempt urgent rules. Older standards are left alone.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 436.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Apply the day one regulatory freeze to the EPA without exception,” Project 2025, chapter 13, p. 436. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch13-no-epa-exception-to-regulatory-freeze/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →