Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 18 › Proposal

Set a bright-line test for employee versus contractor

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 18, p. 591. Written by Jonathan Berry.

Set a bright-line test for employee versus contractor

The document says “should”Who acts: CongressHow: legislationp. 591 in the PDF
What the document says

“Congress should establish a bright-line test—based on the level of control an individual exercises over his or her work”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 591

The chapter says businesses and workers must navigate many different definitions of employee and independent contractor across employment, compensation, tort, tax and pension law, which causes confusion, misclassification and costly litigation. It asks that the department and the labor board return to their 2019 and 2021 independent contractor rules and that Congress provide a safe harbor for companies offering independent workers access to earned benefits.

What the document actually says

“Congress should establish a bright-line test—based on the level of control an individual exercises over his or her work”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 591
That sentence, in plain words

Congress should set one clear test. It would turn on how much control a person has over the work.

What this is about

A worker can be an employee or a contractor. The rules for telling them apart differ by law. The book wants one clear test.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing indexed comes close. No indexed rule, law or order sets a test for whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor, returns the Labor Department or the labor board to their 2019 and 2021 rules, or creates a safe harbor. The candidates share only common words with the proposal. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 591.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Set a bright-line test for employee versus contractor,” Project 2025, chapter 18, p. 591. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch18-independent-contractor-test/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →