Read theMandate

Project 2025Chapter 18 › Proposal

Return to a direct control standard for joint employers

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 18, p. 591. Written by Jonathan Berry.

Return to a direct control standard for joint employers

The document says “shouldWho acts: DOL, NLRB, CongressHow: regulationp. 591 in the PDF
What the document says

“DOL and NLRB should return to the long-standing approach to defining joint employers based on direct and immediate control.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 591

A joint employer standard determines when one company is legally responsible for another's workers, which matters most for franchises and contractors. The chapter asks Congress to enact the Save Local Business Act to codify the narrower definition.

What the document actually says

“DOL and NLRB should return to the long-standing approach to defining joint employers based on direct and immediate control.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 591
That sentence, in plain words

Go back to the older test for when two firms share a worker. It turns on direct control.

What this is about

Sometimes two firms both count as a worker's boss. That matters for franchises. The book wants the narrower old test back.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to read this page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →