Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 19 › Proposal

Send transportation money to the states to spend as they choose

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 19, p. 621. Written by Diana Furchtgott-Roth.

Send transportation money to the states to spend as they choose

The document says “would be more efficient”Who acts: CongressHow: legislationp. 621 in the PDF
What the document says

“it would be more efficient for the U.S. Congress to send transportation grants to each of the 50 states and allow each state to purchase the transportation services that it thinks are best.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 621

The chapter frames this as conditional on funding remaining federal at all, and says the approach would let states prioritize different kinds of transportation, giving states that rely more on cars as its example.

What the document actually says

“it would be more efficient for the U.S. Congress to send transportation grants to each of the 50 states and allow each state to purchase the transportation services that it thinks are best.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 621
That sentence, in plain words

It would work better to send the money to each state. Each state could then buy what it needs.

What this is about

Some states need roads most. Others need buses or trains. The book says each state should choose. Washington would just send the money.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing indexed comes close. No indexed document changes how transportation money reaches the states or lets a state choose which transportation services to buy with it, and the change would take an act of Congress. The nearest candidate is a docket, State of California v. United States Department of Transportation, and the litigation record here carries docket details rather than the text of any ruling. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 621.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Send transportation money to the states to spend as they choose,” Project 2025, chapter 19, p. 621. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch19-block-grant-to-states/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →