Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 19 › Proposal

Reset fuel economy standards to levels reachable by combustion engines

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 19, p. 628. Written by Diana Furchtgott-Roth.

Reset fuel economy standards to levels reachable by combustion engines

The document says “must”Who acts: DOT, NHTSAHow: regulationp. 628 in the PDF
What the document says

“The next Administration must return the federal fuel economy program to the limits established by Congress.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 628

The chapter states that the 1975 statute directs the department to set the maximum feasible mileage requirements achievable with combustion technology, and not so high as to stop automakers profitably meeting demand. It says standards must be reset at levels technologically feasible for combustion vehicles and consistent with increased domestic production, and suggests considering a return to the model year 2020 levels aimed at a fleet-wide average of 35 miles per gallon.

What the document actually says

“The next Administration must return the federal fuel economy program to the limits established by Congress.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 628
That sentence, in plain words

Put the fuel rules back inside the limits Congress set.

What this is about

Cars must average a set number of miles per gallon. The book says the target went too high. It says it should go back to what the law allows.

What has happened
Partly matches

Resetting the Corporate Average Fuel Economy Program

2025-06-11 · 90 FR 24518

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued an interpretive rule on June 11, 2025 titled Resetting the Corporate Average Fuel Economy Program. It sets out the factors the agency reads the law to forbid it from considering when it sets maximum feasible standards under the 1975 and 2007 statutes, describes this as the legal foundation for bringing both the passenger car program and the medium and heavy duty program into compliance with those statutes, and says the agency will exercise its enforcement authority over existing standards according to that reading. That is the chapter's argument about statutory limits carried into agency practice. The fit breaks down because an interpretive rule does not set mileage numbers: replacement standards are left to a later rulemaking, so the levels the chapter asks for, feasible for combustion vehicles, are not yet in place, and the rule takes no position on returning to model year 2020 levels.

In plain English

A federal road safety agency put out a rule on June 11, 2025. It lists the things the law bars it from weighing when it sets gas mileage rules. The agency calls this the legal base for fixing the car and truck programs. But the rule sets no mileage numbers, and new limits are left for later.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 628.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Reset fuel economy standards to levels reachable by combustion engines,” Project 2025, chapter 19, p. 628. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch19-reset-fuel-economy/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →