Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 21 › Proposal

Consolidate or eliminate economic development grants

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 21, p. 664. Written by Thomas F. Gilman.

Consolidate or eliminate economic development grants

The document says “should”Who acts: CongressHow: legislationp. 664 in the PDF
What the document says

“The Economic Development Administration’s grant programs, which are among a broad set of duplicative and overlapping federal economic development grant programs, should be consolidated with other programs and/or eliminated;”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 664

This appears in the chapter's list of structural changes for the next President to consider. The chapter argues that many programs at the department overlap with other government programs and that consolidating them could increase accountability and return on taxpayer investment.

What the document actually says

“The Economic Development Administration’s grant programs, which are among a broad set of duplicative and overlapping federal economic development grant programs, should be consolidated with other programs and/or eliminated;”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 664
That sentence, in plain words

These grants overlap with others. Join them together or end them.

What this is about

One office gives grants to help local economies. Other agencies do the same thing. The book says that is a duplication.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. The Commerce, Justice, Science appropriations act does act on the Economic Development Administration, but it funds the programs rather than consolidating or ending them: $400,000,000 for economic development assistance under the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, available until expended, plus $66,000,000 for administering those programs. No indexed action merges the agency's grant programs with any other program or eliminates them. EO 14255, also a candidate, creates a new Commerce office for large investments and takes over the CHIPS Program Office, which is a different set of programs. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 664.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Consolidate or eliminate economic development grants,” Project 2025, chapter 21, p. 664. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch21-consolidate-economic-development-grants/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →