Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 21 › Proposal

Review and abolish advisory committees not required by law

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 21, p. 666. Written by Thomas F. Gilman.

Review and abolish advisory committees not required by law

The document says “should”Who acts: CommerceHow: internal managementp. 666 in the PDF
What the document says

“Upon entering office, all such committees should be reviewed regarding whether they are required by statute and abolished if they are not.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 666

The chapter states that many of the department's advisory committees are populated by activists from organizations it describes as openly hostile to conservative principles who use the committees to impede conservative policy. It asks that the membership of surviving committees be reconstituted.

What the document actually says

“Upon entering office, all such committees should be reviewed regarding whether they are required by statute and abolished if they are not.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 666
That sentence, in plain words

Check which of these panels the law requires. Close the rest.

What this is about

The department takes advice from outside panels. The book says some are stacked against it. It says panels not required by law should close.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. EO 14354 continues 22 advisory committees created by the President until September 30, 2027 and supersedes the matching sections of the 2023 continuance order. It is the periodic continuance order for presidential committees, and none of the committees on its list belongs to the Commerce Department. It orders no review of whether a committee is required by statute, abolishes none by name, and says nothing about who sits on them. The other candidates, EO 14378 and EO 14397, continue one specific council at the Federal Emergency Management Agency. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 666.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Review and abolish advisory committees not required by law,” Project 2025, chapter 21, p. 666. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch21-review-advisory-committees/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →