Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 27 › Proposal

Abolish the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 27, p. 839. Written by David R. Burton, Robert Bowes.

Abolish the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

The document says “should”Who acts: Congress, PresidentHow: legislationIn: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau · Robert Bowesp. 839 in the PDF
What the document says

“Congress should abolish the CFPB and reverse”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 839

The full sentence asks Congress to abolish the bureau and reverse section 1061 of Dodd-Frank, returning the consumer protection function to banking regulators and the Federal Trade Commission. The part calls the bureau highly politicized, damaging, utterly unaccountable and unconstitutional, and says that provided the Supreme Court affirms a Fifth Circuit holding then pending, the next President should order the immediate dissolution of the agency, pull down its rules and guidance and return its staff to their prior agencies.

What the document actually says

“Congress should abolish the CFPB and reverse”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 839
That sentence, in plain words

Congress should close this agency down.

What this is about

One agency polices banks and lenders for unfair treatment of customers. The book says it answers to no one. It says Congress should close it.

What has happened
Partly matches

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions”

2025-05-09 · 139 Stat. 53

Public Law 119-10, enacted in 2025 under the Congressional Review Act, states that Congress disapproves the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Overdraft Lending rule for very large financial institutions and that the rule shall have no force or effect. A companion, Public Law 119-11, does the same to the bureau's larger participants rule for digital payment applications. That answers the part of the chapter that asks Congress to pull down the bureau's rules. It does not answer the proposal itself: the bureau continues to exist with its funding and structure intact, section 1061 of Dodd-Frank is untouched, no function returns to the banking regulators or the Federal Trade Commission, and the resolutions state no reason and reach only the two rules they name.

In plain English

Congress struck down two rules from the consumer bureau. A pair of laws say those rules have no force. But the bureau itself stands, with its money and shape unchanged. The chapter asked for it to be closed, and no duty moved to another agency.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 839.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Abolish the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,” Project 2025, chapter 27, p. 839. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch27-abolish-cfpb/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →