Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 27 › Proposal

Treat most digital assets as commodities rather than securities

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 27, p. 835. Written by David R. Burton, Robert Bowes.

Treat most digital assets as commodities rather than securities

The document says “should”Who acts: SEC, CFTC, CongressHow: regulationIn: Securities and Exchange Commission and Related Agencies · David R. Burtonp. 835 in the PDF
What the document says

“Otherwise, the digital asset shall be deemed a commodity to be regulated by the CFTC, not the SEC.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 835

The part proposes a joint regulation under which a digital asset holder is not treated as party to an investment contract unless entitled to a share of earnings, a defined flow of payments, or rights against assets on liquidation. It says both agencies have been irresponsible in this area, choosing regulation by enforcement and doing it poorly, and that Congress should legislate if they do not act.

What the document actually says

“Otherwise, the digital asset shall be deemed a commodity to be regulated by the CFTC, not the SEC.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 835
That sentence, in plain words

If not, the token counts as a good. A different agency would watch it.

What this is about

Crypto tokens are regulated, but it is unclear by whom. The book sets a test. Most tokens would fall to the commodities agency.

What has happened
Partly matches

Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology

2025-01-23 · 90 FR 8647

Executive Order 14178 of January 23, 2025 takes up the same question by a different route. It makes regulatory clarity and well defined jurisdictional regulatory boundaries a stated policy, revokes the prior digital asset order, and creates a working group that includes both the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, directing it to propose within 180 days a federal regulatory framework for digital assets covering market structure and oversight. It stops short of what the proposal asks: it adopts no test for when a holder is party to an investment contract, deems no asset a commodity, assigns nothing to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and issues no joint regulation, leaving the line between the two agencies where it was and only commissioning recommendations about it.

In plain English

The order takes up the same question by a new route. It calls for clear lines between agencies and pulls the older order on digital assets. It sets up a work group with both market agencies on it. That group had 180 days to propose a set of rules. But no asset is called a commodity. Nothing is handed to either agency, so the old line stands.

What cites those orders

1 agency rule

Each of these names the order above in its own summary, preamble or filing. That is a fact about the document, not a finding that it carries out this proposal: it is one step further away than the order is, and what it does about the proposal is a reading nobody has made here.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 835.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Treat most digital assets as commodities rather than securities,” Project 2025, chapter 27, p. 835. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch27-digital-assets-to-cftc/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →