Read theMandate

Project 2025Chapter 27 › Proposal

End in-house SEC administrative proceedings

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 27, p. 833. Written by David R. Burton, Robert Bowes.

End in-house SEC administrative proceedings

The document says “shouldWho acts: Congress, SECHow: legislationIn: Securities and Exchange Commission and Related Agencies · David R. Burtonp. 833 in the PDF
What the document says

“Eliminate all administrative proceedings (APs) within the SEC except for stop orders related to defective registration statements.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 833

In an administrative proceeding the Commission adjudicates a case before its own administrative law judge rather than in a federal court. The part says the enforcement system does not need both routes, and offers as an alternative that respondents be allowed to elect whether adjudication occurs in the Commission's court or an ordinary court.

What the document actually says

“Eliminate all administrative proceedings (APs) within the SEC except for stop orders related to defective registration statements.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 833
That sentence, in plain words

The agency hears cases in its own court. That should end.

What this is about

The market watchdog can try a case in its own court. It picks the judge. The book says cases should go to a normal court.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to read this page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →