To amend the Wildfire Suppression Aircraft Transfer Act of 1996 to reauthorize the sale by the Department of Defense of aircraft and parts for wildfire suppression purposes, and for other purposes, section 2, Sec. 2.
Written by .
The same two words are added in subsection (c)
The document says “is amended”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 2 in the PDF
What the document says
“(3) in subsection (c), by inserting "or water" after "fire retardant";”
Paragraph (3) makes in subsection (c) the same insertion paragraph (1) makes in subsection (a)(1): the words "or water" are added after "fire retardant".
What the document actually says
“(3) in subsection (c), by inserting "or water" after "fire retardant";”
That sentence, in plain words
This part adds the same two words in one more spot. They go after the words "fire retardant" again.
What this is about
The two words are added twice. Once in one part of the old law. Once in a later part of it.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page
number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary,
not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the
quotation rather than replacing it.
