A reversion is subject to existing rights and rights-of-way
What the document says“the reversion of land to a Village Corporation pursuant to subclause (I) shall be subject to-- "(AA) valid existing rights created by the applicable trust; and "(BB) any existing easements, rights-of-way necessary for public roadway access, or rights-of-way for access of holders of valid existing rights; and”
The first half of subclause (III), which opens In accordance with subsection (g). Land reverting under subclause (I) comes back carrying two things: valid existing rights created by the trust in question, and existing easements and rights-of-way. The rights-of-way named are those necessary for public roadway access and those for access of holders of valid existing rights.
What the document actually says“the reversion of land to a Village Corporation pursuant to subclause (I) shall be subject to-- "(AA) valid existing rights created by the applicable trust; and "(BB) any existing easements, rights-of-way necessary for public roadway access, or rights-of-way for access of holders of valid existing rights; and”
Land that goes back still carries older rights. Some rights come from the trust itself. Others are paths and roads across the land.
A right-of-way lets someone cross land they do not own. Some are for public roads. Others let rights holders reach their own land.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.