Read theMandate

Bankruptcy Administration Improvement Act of 2025Section 2 › Proposal

Congress finds other bankruptcy costs rose while the $60 stayed flat

To amend titles 11 and 28, United States Code, to modify the compensation payable to trustees serving in cases under chapter 7 of title 11, United States Code, to extend the term of certain temporary offices of bankruptcy judges, and for other purposes, section 2, Sec. 2. Written by .

Congress finds other bankruptcy costs rose while the $60 stayed flat

The document says “shouldWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 2 in the PDF
What the document says

“Since 1994, there have been significant increases in salaries, attorney fees, budget appropriations, filing fees, and court-related fees associated with chapter 7 bankruptcies. In contrast, the $60 paid to chapter 7 trustees has remained the same and has not even been increased for inflation.”

To amend titles 11 and 28, United States Code, to modify the compensation payable to trustees serving in cases under chapter 7 of title 11, United States Code, to extend the term of certain temporary offices of bankruptcy judges, and for other purposes, Sec. 2

The first claim in the eighth finding. Congress states that salaries, attorney fees, appropriations, filing fees and court fees tied to chapter 7 cases have all risen significantly since 1994, while the $60 paid to trustees has stayed the same and has not been adjusted for inflation.

What the document actually says

“Since 1994, there have been significant increases in salaries, attorney fees, budget appropriations, filing fees, and court-related fees associated with chapter 7 bankruptcies. In contrast, the $60 paid to chapter 7 trustees has remained the same and has not even been increased for inflation.”

To amend titles 11 and 28, United States Code, to modify the compensation payable to trustees serving in cases under chapter 7 of title 11, United States Code, to extend the term of certain temporary offices of bankruptcy judges, and for other purposes, Sec. 2
That sentence, in plain words

Congress says other costs in these cases went up a lot. The sixty dollars did not go up at all.

What this is about

Pay, court fees and lawyer bills all rose. Prices in general rose too. The trustee pay stayed where it was.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Bankruptcy Administration Improvement Act of 2025, Public Law 119-76, sec. 2, 140 Stat. 740 (2026).
    https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ76/html/PLAW-119publ76.htm

  2. This page

    “Congress finds other bankruptcy costs rose while the $60 stayed flat,” Bankruptcy Administration Improvement Act of 2025, section 2, Sec. 2. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/bankruptcy-administration-improvement-act-2025/proposal/sec02-other-costs-rose-while-pay-did-not/ (retrieved August 26, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →