This part changes the fee that a chapter 11 case pays every three months. It stretches a five year window to ten years. It changes two rate numbers. It also says where that fee money goes through 2031.
The document says “is amended”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 4 in the PDF
What the document says
“Section 1930(a)(6)(B) of title 28, United States Code, is amended-- (1) in clause (i), by striking ``5-year'' and inserting ``10-year''; and”
This Act amends clause (i) of section 1930(a)(6)(B) of title 28, United States Code, replacing 5-year with 10-year. Section 1930 is not indexed here, so nothing recorded says what the period runs from or governs.
What the document actually says
“Section 1930(a)(6)(B) of title 28, United States Code, is amended-- (1) in clause (i), by striking ``5-year'' and inserting ``10-year''; and”
That sentence, in plain words
A rule about fees names a five year span. This law makes it ten years.
What this is about
The span sits in an older law. Only the length is changed here. This law does not print what the span is for.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The document says “is amended”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 4 in the PDF
What the document says
“in subclause (I)-- (i) by inserting ``the greater of'' before ``0.4''”
The first change to subclause (I) of clause (ii). This Act inserts the words the greater of ahead of the figure 0.4. The subclause itself is in section 1930 of title 28, United States Code, which is not indexed here.
What the document actually says
“in subclause (I)-- (i) by inserting ``the greater of'' before ``0.4''”
That sentence, in plain words
Three words are put into an older rule. The words are the greater of. They go in front of the number 0.4.
What this is about
The greater of means: pick the bigger one. So the rule now weighs two amounts. This law does not print the rest of that rule.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The document says “is amended”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 4 in the PDF
What the document says
“by striking ``and'' at the end and inserting ``or''”
The second change to the same subclause. This Act replaces the word and at its end with the word or.
What the document actually says
“by striking ``and'' at the end and inserting ``or''”
That sentence, in plain words
One word at the end of the rule is swapped. The word and becomes the word or.
What this is about
And means both things apply. Or means one of them does. A one word swap can change what a rule asks for.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The document says “is amended”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 4 in the PDF
What the document says
“in subclause (II), by striking ``0.8'' and inserting ``0.9''.”
The change to subclause (II) of the same clause. This Act replaces the figure 0.8 with 0.9. What the figure is a rate of is set out in section 1930 of title 28, United States Code, which is not indexed here.
What the document actually says
“in subclause (II), by striking ``0.8'' and inserting ``0.9''.”
That sentence, in plain words
A number in the rule goes up. It was 0.8. Now it is 0.9.
What this is about
This law does not print what the number counts. So this record does not say. It gives the change and stops.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The document says “is amended”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 4 in the PDF
What the document says
“Section 589a(f) of title 28, United States Code, as amended by section 3(c)(2), is amended by striking ``2026'' each place it appears and inserting ``2031''.”
This Act changes the year 2026 to 2031 wherever it appears in section 589a(f) of title 28, United States Code, working on that subsection as section 3(c)(2) of this Act has already left it. Section 589a is not indexed here, so nothing recorded says what the year governs.
What the document actually says
“Section 589a(f) of title 28, United States Code, as amended by section 3(c)(2), is amended by striking ``2026'' each place it appears and inserting ``2031''.”
That sentence, in plain words
One year is swapped for another. The year 2026 becomes 2031. This happens at every spot it shows up.
What this is about
Part three of this law changed the same rule first. This change comes after that one. The new year is five years later.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The document says “shall”Who acts: Department of the TreasuryHow: statuteSec. 4 in the PDF
What the document says
“the fees collected under section 1930(a)(6) of title 28, United States Code, less the amount specified in subparagraph (2) of this subsection, shall be deposited as specified in section 589a(f) of title 28, United States Code, as amended by this Act; and”
A free standing rule for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2031, stated to apply notwithstanding section 589a(b) of title 28, United States Code. The quarterly fees collected under section 1930(a)(6), less the $5,400,000 set aside below, go where section 589a(f) directs as this Act has amended it.
What the document actually says
“the fees collected under section 1930(a)(6) of title 28, United States Code, less the amount specified in subparagraph (2) of this subsection, shall be deposited as specified in section 589a(f) of title 28, United States Code, as amended by this Act; and”
That sentence, in plain words
The fees paid every three months go to a set place. First a fixed sum is taken out. The rest follows the older rule.
What this is about
This holds for six budget years. They run from 2026 through 2031. The fixed sum is named in the next rule.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The document says “shall”Who acts: Department of the TreasuryHow: statuteSec. 4 in the PDF
What the document says
“$5,400,000 of the fees collected under section 1930(a)(6) of title 28, United States Code, shall be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury.”
The set aside referred to in the rule above. In each of fiscal years 2026 through 2031, $5,400,000 of the quarterly fees collected under section 1930(a)(6) of title 28, United States Code, goes to the general fund of the Treasury rather than to the funds that take the rest.
What the document actually says
“$5,400,000 of the fees collected under section 1930(a)(6) of title 28, United States Code, shall be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury.”
That sentence, in plain words
A fixed sum of the fee money goes to the main Treasury pot. The sum is five million four hundred thousand dollars.
What this is about
That pot is the one the government spends from in general. It is not a pot set aside for these cases. The rule holds for each of the six years.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
Each distinct thing the section does: the change from a 5-year to a 10-year period in section 1930(a)(6)(B)(i) of title 28, the two changes to subclause (I) of clause (ii), the change from 0.8 to 0.9 in subclause (II), the change of 2026 to 2031 wherever it appears in section 589a(f) of title 28, and the two deposit rules for fiscal years 2026 through 2031.
Nothing in the section is left out.
The section works by amending older law and by directing deposits under it. Sections 589a and 1930 of title 28, United States Code, are not indexed here, so nothing recorded says what the amended text reads as a whole. In particular the quarterly fee formula that the numbers 0.4, 0.8 and 0.9 belong to is in section 1930, not in this Act, so this record does not say what those numbers are a rate of.
