Read theMandate

Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026Section 5 › Proposal

$744,195,000 for EPA science and technology

Making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, section 5, Sec. 5. Written by .

$744,195,000 for EPA science and technology

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Environmental Protection AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“and other operating expenses in support of research and development, $744,195,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The science and technology account of the Environmental Protection Agency, which pays for its research and development, including research under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980. Of the total, $27,253,000 is for research national priorities named in the explanatory statement described in section 4.

What the document actually says

“and other operating expenses in support of research and development, $744,195,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

EPA research gets $744,195,000. The money can be used until September 30, 2027.

What this is about

The EPA runs labs and studies. The work backs up the rules it writes. A report names some of the topics.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →