Read theMandate

Congressional Award Program Reauthorization ActSection 3 › Proposal

Words are struck and replaced in subsection (f)(1)

To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act, section 3, Sec. 3. Written by .

Words are struck and replaced in subsection (f)(1)

The document says “is amendedWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 3 in the PDF
What the document says

“in subsection (f)(1), in the second sentence, by striking ``Subject to subsection (a), the'' and inserting ``The''.”

To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act, Sec. 3

Paragraph (2) of section 3. In the second sentence of subsection (f)(1) of section 102 of the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 802), it strikes the words Subject to subsection (a), the and inserts the word The. The words struck are the cross reference to the subsection paragraph (1) of this section edits.

What the document actually says

“in subsection (f)(1), in the second sentence, by striking ``Subject to subsection (a), the'' and inserting ``The''.”

To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act, Sec. 3
That sentence, in plain words

A few words in another line are swapped. The words Subject to subsection (a), the come out. The word The goes in.

What this is about

Those words pointed back at the line that was cut. With the line gone, they had nothing to point at.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →