A sentence is struck from subsection (a) of section 102
To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act, section 3, Sec. 3.
Written by .
A sentence is struck from subsection (a) of section 102
The document says “is amended”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 3 in the PDF
What the document says
“in subsection (a), by striking ``Each medal shall consist of gold-plate over bronze, rhodium over bronze, or bronze and shall be struck in accordance with subsection (f).''”
Paragraph (1) of section 3. It strikes the quoted sentence from subsection (a) of section 102 of the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 802). The words in quotation marks are the words this Act directs be removed, and nothing is inserted in their place.
What the document actually says
“in subsection (a), by striking ``Each medal shall consist of gold-plate over bronze, rhodium over bronze, or bronze and shall be struck in accordance with subsection (f).''”
That sentence, in plain words
An older law had a line about what each medal is made of. This law takes that line out.
What this is about
The line named metals like bronze. It also said how the medal was made. Those words are gone now.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
Congressional Award Program Reauthorization Act, Public Law 119-66, sec. 3, 139 Stat. 1992 (2025). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ66/html/PLAW-119publ66.htm
This page
“A sentence is struck from subsection (a) of section 102,” Congressional Award Program Reauthorization Act, section 3, Sec. 3. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/congressional-award-program-reauthorization-act/proposal/sec03-strike-medal-composition-sentence/ (retrieved October 10, 2026).
Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.
How to Read This Page
The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page
number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary,
not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the
quotation rather than replacing it.
