Read theMandate

Congressional Award Program Reauthorization ActSection 3 › Proposal

A sentence is struck from subsection (a) of section 102

To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act, section 3, Sec. 3. Written by .

A sentence is struck from subsection (a) of section 102

The document says “is amendedWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 3 in the PDF
What the document says

“in subsection (a), by striking ``Each medal shall consist of gold-plate over bronze, rhodium over bronze, or bronze and shall be struck in accordance with subsection (f).''”

To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act, Sec. 3

Paragraph (1) of section 3. It strikes the quoted sentence from subsection (a) of section 102 of the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 802). The words in quotation marks are the words this Act directs be removed, and nothing is inserted in their place.

What the document actually says

“in subsection (a), by striking ``Each medal shall consist of gold-plate over bronze, rhodium over bronze, or bronze and shall be struck in accordance with subsection (f).''”

To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act, Sec. 3
That sentence, in plain words

An older law had a line about what each medal is made of. This law takes that line out.

What this is about

The line named metals like bronze. It also said how the medal was made. Those words are gone now.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →