Read theMandate

Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026Section 101 › Proposal

The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026 date becomes February 13, 2026

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, section 101, Sec. 101. Written by .

The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026 date becomes February 13, 2026

The document says “is amendedWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 101 in the PDF
What the document says

“The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026 (division A of Public Law 119-37) is amended by striking the date specified in section 106(3) and inserting ``February 13, 2026''.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 101

Section 101 of division H amends the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026, division A of Public Law 119-37, by striking the date specified in its section 106(3) and inserting February 13, 2026.

What the document actually says

“The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026 (division A of Public Law 119-37) is amended by striking the date specified in section 106(3) and inserting ``February 13, 2026''.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 101
That sentence, in plain words

In the stopgap funding law, cross out the date in one part. Write in February 13, 2026.

What this is about

A stopgap law keeps the government open for a short time. It names the day it runs out. Moving that day buys more time.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →