A claim may not be barred solely because the beneficiary was in another state
What the document says“the entity shall not be prohibited from submitting a claim for payment for such services solely by reason of the location of such beneficiary at such time; and”
Where an entity takes part in the online-only way, and furnishes online services to a beneficiary who was not in the same State as the entity, the entity may not be barred from submitting a claim for payment solely because of where the beneficiary was.
What the document actually says“the entity shall not be prohibited from submitting a claim for payment for such services solely by reason of the location of such beneficiary at such time; and”
The group may still bill for those classes. Where the person was at the time is not a reason to stop it.
Online classes cross state lines. A rule tied to place would block that. This part removes the block for these classes.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.