Read theMandate

Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026Section 6401 › Proposal

Teaching health centers get sums rising to $300,000,000 by fiscal year 2029

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, section 6401, Sec. 6401. Written by .

Teaching health centers get sums rising to $300,000,000 by fiscal year 2029

The document says “is amendedWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 6401 in the PDF
What the document says

“``(G) $250,000,000 for fiscal year 2027; ``(H) $275,000,000 for fiscal year 2028; and ``(I) $300,000,000 for fiscal year 2029.''.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6401

Subsection (c) of section 6401 replaces subparagraphs (D) through (G) of section 340H(g)(1) of the Public Health Service Act. It sets $225,000,000 for fiscal year 2026, $250,000,000 for 2027, $275,000,000 for 2028 and $300,000,000 for 2029, and restates the 2024 and 2025 figures.

What the document actually says

“``(G) $250,000,000 for fiscal year 2027; ``(H) $275,000,000 for fiscal year 2028; and ``(I) $300,000,000 for fiscal year 2029.''.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6401
That sentence, in plain words

For 2027 the sum is $250,000,000. For 2028 it is $275,000,000. For 2029 it is $300,000,000.

What this is about

A teaching health center trains new doctors outside a hospital. The sums rise each year. This one runs three years past the others.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →