Read theMandate

Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026Section 6602 › Proposal

Three steps must precede a finding of failure

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, section 6602, Sec. 6602. Written by .

Three steps must precede a finding of failure

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Health and Human ServicesHow: statuteSec. 6602 in the PDF
What the document says

“``(B) provide such person with a 45-day period beginning on the date of receipt of such noncompliance letter to respond in writing as set forth in such paragraph; and”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6602

Subsection (b) of section 6602 adds a new paragraph (4). Before concluding that a person failed to meet a requirement, the Secretary must issue a noncompliance letter, give the person 45 days from receipt to respond in writing, and after reviewing the response decide whether the person showed a lack of due diligence.

What the document actually says

“``(B) provide such person with a 45-day period beginning on the date of receipt of such noncompliance letter to respond in writing as set forth in such paragraph; and”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6602
That sentence, in plain words

The maker gets 45 days to answer in writing. The clock starts when the letter arrives.

What this is about

The health chief must send a letter first. Then comes the answer. Only after reading it can the chief find a failure.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →