Read theMandate

Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 › Section 6701

Oversight of Pharmacy Benefit Management Services

Section 6701 · Sec. 6701 ·

What this chapter is about

This part makes drug middlemen report to the employer health plans they serve. The report comes at least twice a year and covers every drug claimed. It starts with plan years 30 months after this law passed. Breaking the rule costs $10,000 a day, and false information up to $100,000 an item.

13 proposals indexed from this chapter.

The document says “shall notWho acts: group health plans, health insurance issuers, entities providing pharmacy benefit management servicesHow: statuteSec. 6701 in the PDF
What the document says

“shall not enter into a contract, including an extension or renewal of a contract, entered into on or after the effective date, with an applicable entity unless such applicable entity agrees to-- ``(1) not limit or delay the disclosure of information to the group health plan”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701

Section 6701 adds a new section 2799A-11 to the Public Health Service Act, and the same requirements as section 726 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and section 9826 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. For plan years beginning 30 months or more after enactment, a group health plan, an issuer, or an entity providing pharmacy benefit management services may not enter, extend or renew a contract with an applicable entity unless that entity agrees not to limit or delay disclosure in a way that prevents the required reports, and to provide the information needed to make them.

What the document actually says

“shall not enter into a contract, including an extension or renewal of a contract, entered into on or after the effective date, with an applicable entity unless such applicable entity agrees to-- ``(1) not limit or delay the disclosure of information to the group health plan”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701
That sentence, in plain words

No new deal may be signed with such a firm unless it agrees to one thing. It must not hold back or slow down what the plan is told.

What this is about

A drug maker or a rebate firm can bind a middleman to silence. Then the plan cannot be told what it paid. This bars deals with that term in them.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: entities providing pharmacy benefit management servicesHow: statuteSec. 6701 in the PDF
What the document says

“not less frequently than every 6 months (or, at the request of a group health plan, not less frequently than quarterly, and under the same conditions, terms, and cost of the semiannual report under this subsection), shall submit to the group health plan a report in accordance with this section.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701

For plan years beginning on or after the effective date, an entity providing pharmacy benefit management services under a contract entered, extended or renewed on or after that date must report to the group health plan at least every six months, or quarterly at the plan's request on the same terms and cost. Each report must be in plain language, in a machine-readable format, and in such other formats as the Secretary determines.

What the document actually says

“not less frequently than every 6 months (or, at the request of a group health plan, not less frequently than quarterly, and under the same conditions, terms, and cost of the semiannual report under this subsection), shall submit to the group health plan a report in accordance with this section.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701
That sentence, in plain words

The report must come at least every six months. The plan may ask for one every three months instead. That costs no more.

What this is about

The plan pays for drug coverage but often cannot see what happens to the money. A set report closes that gap. It must be in plain words and readable by a computer.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: entities providing pharmacy benefit management servicesHow: statuteSec. 6701 in the PDF
What the document says

“a list of drugs for which a claim was filed and, with respect to each such drug on such list--”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701

For a plan offered by a specified large employer or that is a specified large plan and is not insured, or where the opt-in is made, the report must list each drug claimed with what the plan paid the manager, what the pharmacy was paid, the difference between the two, the drug's names and code, the dispensing channel, whether it is brand or generic with its cost, claim and unit counts, net price after rebates, out-of-pocket spending, total net spending, rebates and other remuneration received by the plan and by the manager, and manufacturer copay assistance. It must also give the same picture by therapeutic class, formulary placement rationales for drugs over $10,000 in gross spending, and detail on affiliated pharmacies including prices there against other network pharmacies.

What the document actually says

“a list of drugs for which a claim was filed and, with respect to each such drug on such list--”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701
That sentence, in plain words

The report must list each drug that was claimed. For each one it must give the facts set out next.

What this is about

The heart of it is one line: what the plan paid, what the pharmacy got, and the gap. That gap is what the middleman kept.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: entities providing pharmacy benefit management services, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesHow: statuteSec. 6701 in the PDF
What the document says

“a summary document for plans and issuers to provide to participants and beneficiaries, which shall be made available to participants or beneficiaries upon request to their group health plan”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701

For every group health plan, whatever its size, the report must include a summary document for the plan holding what the Secretary determines is useful for choosing pharmacy benefit management services, and a second summary document for participants and beneficiaries, available on request, containing only aggregate information and stating that they may request claims level information. It must also give total net spending on drugs, amounts received in rebates and other remuneration, manufacturer copay assistance, payments to brokers and consultants for referring or retaining the business, an explanation of benefit designs steering members to affiliated pharmacies, and total gross spending.

What the document actually says

“a summary document for plans and issuers to provide to participants and beneficiaries, which shall be made available to participants or beneficiaries upon request to their group health plan”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701
That sentence, in plain words

There must also be a short document for the people covered by the plan. They can ask their plan for it.

What this is about

The short one gives totals, not single claims. A member who wants their own claim details can ask for those too. That right is set out below.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “canWho acts: group health plansHow: statuteSec. 6701 in the PDF
What the document says

“such group health plan may, on an annual basis, for plan years beginning on or after the date that is 30 months after the date of enactment of this section, elect to require an entity providing pharmacy benefit management services on behalf of the health insurance issuer to submit to such group health plan a report that includes all of the information described in paragraph (2)(A), in addition to the information described in paragraph (2)(B).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701

Where coverage is offered through an insurance issuer in connection with a plan of a specified large employer or a specified large plan, the plan may elect each year to require the full report, adding the detailed information to the summary information every plan receives.

What the document actually says

“such group health plan may, on an annual basis, for plan years beginning on or after the date that is 30 months after the date of enactment of this section, elect to require an entity providing pharmacy benefit management services on behalf of the health insurance issuer to submit to such group health plan a report that includes all of the information described in paragraph (2)(A), in addition to the information described in paragraph (2)(B).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701
That sentence, in plain words

Each year such a plan may choose to ask for more. It may require the full report on top of the short one.

What this is about

A plan that buys coverage through an insurer gets only the short report by default. This lets it ask for the long one.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: entities providing pharmacy benefit management services, group health plansHow: statuteSec. 6701 in the PDF
What the document says

“shall ensure that such report contains only summary health information, as defined in section 164.504(a) of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701

The reports must follow the privacy regulations under section 13402(a) of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act and under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, and must contain only summary health information. Nothing in the section changes those regulations or affects other federal or state privacy or civil rights laws. A plan receiving a report may disclose it only to the entity that sent it or that entity's business associates.

What the document actually says

“shall ensure that such report contains only summary health information, as defined in section 164.504(a) of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701
That sentence, in plain words

The report may hold only one kind of health data. It is the summary kind, as named in a rule about privacy.

What this is about

The report is about money, not about who was sick. Health privacy rules still apply to all of it.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: group health plansHow: statuteSec. 6701 in the PDF
What the document says

“Each plan year, group health plans, including with respect to group health insurance coverage offered in connection with a group health plan, shall provide to each participant or beneficiary written notice informing the participant or beneficiary of the requirement for entities providing pharmacy benefit management services”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701

Each plan year a group health plan must give every participant or beneficiary written notice of the reporting requirement, which may be done by including it in plan documents or by individual notice.

What the document actually says

“Each plan year, group health plans, including with respect to group health insurance coverage offered in connection with a group health plan, shall provide to each participant or beneficiary written notice informing the participant or beneficiary of the requirement for entities providing pharmacy benefit management services”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701
That sentence, in plain words

Each plan year the plan must tell each member in writing. The notice says that these reports are required.

What this is about

A right nobody knows about goes unused. The notice may sit in the plan papers or come on its own.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Health and Human ServicesHow: ruleSec. 6701 in the PDF
What the document says

“The Secretary shall define through rulemaking a limited form of the report under paragraph (1) required with respect to any group health plan established by a plan sponsor that is, or is affiliated with, a drug manufacturer, drug wholesaler, or other direct participant in the drug supply chain, in order to prevent anti-competitive behavior.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701

The Secretary must define by rulemaking a limited form of the report for a group health plan set up by a sponsor that is, or is affiliated with, a drug manufacturer, wholesaler or other direct participant in the drug supply chain, in order to prevent anti-competitive behavior.

What the document actually says

“The Secretary shall define through rulemaking a limited form of the report under paragraph (1) required with respect to any group health plan established by a plan sponsor that is, or is affiliated with, a drug manufacturer, drug wholesaler, or other direct participant in the drug supply chain, in order to prevent anti-competitive behavior.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701
That sentence, in plain words

The health chief must write a rule making a shorter report. It applies where the plan's sponsor is part of the drug trade.

What this is about

The full report holds rival firms' prices. In the hands of a drug maker that could distort the market. So that sponsor sees less.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Health and Human ServicesHow: ruleSec. 6701 in the PDF
What the document says

“Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall specify through rulemaking a standard format for entities providing pharmacy benefit management services on behalf of group health plans and health insurance issuers offering group health insurance coverage, to submit reports required under paragraph (1).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701

Within 18 months of enactment the Secretary must set a standard report format by rulemaking, and must issue any other final regulations needed. In doing so the Secretary must, so far as practicable, align these reporting requirements with those under the neighboring transparency section.

What the document actually says

“Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall specify through rulemaking a standard format for entities providing pharmacy benefit management services on behalf of group health plans and health insurance issuers offering group health insurance coverage, to submit reports required under paragraph (1).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701
That sentence, in plain words

Within 18 months the health chief must set the form these reports take. It must be done by a rule.

What this is about

Reports in different shapes cannot be compared. One form fixes that. The chief must also line it up with a nearby reporting rule.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: group health plansHow: statuteSec. 6701 in the PDF
What the document says

“upon request of a participant or beneficiary, shall provide to such participant or beneficiary-- ``(1) the summary document described in subsection (b)(2)(B)(ii); and”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701

On request, a group health plan must give a participant or beneficiary the member summary document, and the difference between what the plan paid the manager and what the pharmacy was paid, for a claim made by or on behalf of that person.

What the document actually says

“upon request of a participant or beneficiary, shall provide to such participant or beneficiary-- ``(1) the summary document described in subsection (b)(2)(B)(ii); and”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701
That sentence, in plain words

If a member asks, the plan must hand over the short document.

What this is about

The member may also ask about their own claim. What they get is the gap between what the plan paid and what the pharmacy got.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of LaborHow: statuteSec. 6701 in the PDF
What the document says

“shall be subject to a civil monetary penalty in the amount of $10,000 for each day during which such violation continues or such information is not disclosed or reported.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701

A plan, issuer, manager or applicable entity that violates the contract rule, a manager that fails to report, or a plan that fails to give a member the required information, is subject to a civil monetary penalty of $10,000 for each day the violation continues. Knowingly providing false information carries a penalty of up to $100,000 for each item, in addition to other penalties. Section 1128A of the Social Security Act applies to the procedure. Parallel authority is added to section 502(c) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

What the document actually says

“shall be subject to a civil monetary penalty in the amount of $10,000 for each day during which such violation continues or such information is not disclosed or reported.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701
That sentence, in plain words

The penalty is $10,000 for each day. It runs while the breach lasts or while the facts go unreported.

What this is about

A penalty per day pushes toward fixing it fast. False information is treated worse. Each false item can cost up to $100,000.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may not be construedWho acts: Secretary of Health and Human ServicesHow: statuteSec. 6701 in the PDF
What the document says

“Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit a health insurance issuer, group health plan, entity providing pharmacy benefit management services on behalf of a group health plan or health insurance issuer, or other entity to restrict disclosure to, or otherwise limit the access of, the Secretary”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701

The Secretary may waive the daily penalties, or extend the time for compliance, for an entity that made a good-faith effort to comply. Nothing in the section allows an issuer, plan, manager or other entity to restrict the Secretary's access to a report or to information about compliance. An entity may place reasonable restrictions on public disclosure, but may not restrict disclosure to the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor or the Treasury.

What the document actually says

“Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit a health insurance issuer, group health plan, entity providing pharmacy benefit management services on behalf of a group health plan or health insurance issuer, or other entity to restrict disclosure to, or otherwise limit the access of, the Secretary”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701
That sentence, in plain words

Nothing here lets these firms cut off the health chief. They may not hold back a report or block access to it.

What this is about

A firm that tried in good faith may get a break on the penalty. But it may never shut the agency out of the data.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “meansWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 6701 in the PDF
What the document says

“The term `specified large employer' means, in connection with a group health plan (including group health insurance coverage offered in connection with such a plan) established or maintained by a single employer, with respect to a calendar year or a plan year, as applicable, an employer who employed an average of at least 100 employees on business days during the preceding calendar year or plan year”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701

The new section defines applicable entity to cover group purchasing organizations affiliated with a manager, drug manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, rebate aggregators, associated third parties, their subsidiaries, parents, affiliates and subcontractors, and others the Secretary specifies. Contracted compensation is ingredient cost plus dispensing fee. Gross spending is figured before rebates and other remuneration and net spending after. A specified large employer averaged at least 100 employees in the prior year, and a specified large plan averaged at least 100 participants. Remuneration is defined by the Secretary through rulemaking and must be reevaluated every five years.

What the document actually says

“The term `specified large employer' means, in connection with a group health plan (including group health insurance coverage offered in connection with such a plan) established or maintained by a single employer, with respect to a calendar year or a plan year, as applicable, an employer who employed an average of at least 100 employees on business days during the preceding calendar year or plan year”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 6701
That sentence, in plain words

A specified large employer is one with 100 workers or more. That is the average count over the work days of the year before.

What this is about

The line at 100 decides which plans get the long report. Below it, a plan gets the short one. The other terms name who must hand data over.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

What This Page Covers, and What It Leaves Out

The main things the section does: bar contracts with an applicable entity that will not agree to release the needed information, require the semiannual report and set out what it must contain, allow an opt-in for insured large plans, set privacy requirements and a written notice duty, require a limited form of report for supply chain sponsors, require a standard format and regulations within 18 months, require information to participants on request, set penalties and waivers, bar restricting the Secretary's access, and define the terms.

The contents of the report, item by item. Clauses (i) through (iv) of paragraph (2)(A) run to many dozens of data points and are recorded in summary. The section enacts the same requirements three times, in the Public Health Service Act, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the site records the substance once rather than three times.

The section adds new sections to three statutes that are not indexed here, and points at privacy regulations in title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations. What those provide is not recorded on this site.