A rescinded notice returns the employee to September 30, 2025 status
What the document says“Any employee who received notice of being subject to such a reduction in force shall have that notice rescinded and be returned to employment status as of September 30, 2025, without interruption. Such employees shall receive all pay to which they otherwise would have been entitled in the absence of receiving such notice, including backpay in accordance with section 116 of this Act.”
This is the remedy that follows from voiding the reductions in force: the notice is withdrawn, the employment record shows no break, and the pay that would have been earned is paid, drawing on the pay money made available by section 116 of division A.
What the document actually says“Any employee who received notice of being subject to such a reduction in force shall have that notice rescinded and be returned to employment status as of September 30, 2025, without interruption. Such employees shall receive all pay to which they otherwise would have been entitled in the absence of receiving such notice, including backpay in accordance with section 116 of this Act.”
The notice is taken back. The worker goes back to the job with no break in the record. The missed pay is paid.
Losing a job also breaks pay and benefits. This puts both back. It treats the worker as if the notice was never sent.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.