A provider served with legal process for Senate data must tell the Senate office
What the document says“A provider for a Senate office shall not be barred from providing notice to a Senate office and the Office of the SAA under subparagraph (A) by operation of any court order, any statutory provision, any other provision of law, any rule of civil or criminal procedure, or any other rule, regulation, or policy.”
Section 213 of division C rewrites section 10 of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2005. A phone or email provider that receives legal process for Senate data has to notify the Senate office and the Sergeant at Arms, no court order or other law can bar that notice, and the provider is not liable for giving it. Notice may be delayed up to 60 days at a time, renewable, only where the Senator is a formally designated target of a criminal investigation and a court makes the required findings.
What the document actually says“A provider for a Senate office shall not be barred from providing notice to a Senate office and the Office of the SAA under subparagraph (A) by operation of any court order, any statutory provision, any other provision of law, any rule of civil or criminal procedure, or any other rule, regulation, or policy.”
No court order can stop a phone company. It may tell a Senate office that its records were asked for.
Someone may ask a company for records and tell it to keep quiet. That gag does not work here.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.