Making continuing appropriations and extensions for fiscal year 2026, and for other purposes, section 6302, Sec. 6302.
Written by .
The program is funded through January 30, 2026
The document says “is amended”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 6302 in the PDF
What the document says
“and inserting "2025, and for the period beginning on October 1, 2025, and ending on January 30, 2026"”
The section amends section 513 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 713). Subsection (f) sets the amount for the new period at the pro rata portion of what was appropriated for the same stretch of fiscal year 2025.
What the document actually says
“and inserting "2025, and for the period beginning on October 1, 2025, and ending on January 30, 2026"”
That sentence, in plain words
A long list of past part years comes out. In its place goes one short period ending January 30, 2026.
What this is about
The program has been kept going by short bills. Each left its own dates behind. Here they are swept up and replaced.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
Continuing Appropriations, Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Extensions Act, 2026, Public Law 119-37, sec. 6302, 139 Stat. 635 (2025). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ37/html/PLAW-119publ37.htm
This page
“The program is funded through January 30, 2026,” Continuing Appropriations, Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Extensions Act, 2026, section 6302, Sec. 6302. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/continuing-appropriations-agriculture-legislative/proposal/sec6302-funding-runs-to-january-30-2026/ (retrieved October 10, 2026).
Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.
How to Read This Page
The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page
number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary,
not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the
quotation rather than replacing it.
