A technical correction adds the word sponsors to one subclause
Making continuing appropriations and extensions for fiscal year 2026, and for other purposes, section 6508, Sec. 6508.
Written by .
A technical correction adds the word sponsors to one subclause
The document says “is amended”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 6508 in the PDF
What the document says
“is amended by striking "requestors" and inserting "sponsors or requestors".”
The correction is to section 505G(b)(2)(A)(iv)(III) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. It makes that subclause read like the rest of the section.
What the document actually says
“is amended by striking "requestors" and inserting "sponsors or requestors".”
That sentence, in plain words
One word is taken out. Three words are put in its place.
What this is about
The old text named only one of the two groups. This adds the other. Nothing else about the rule changes.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page
number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary,
not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the
quotation rather than replacing it.
