A 60-day period in paragraph (2) becomes a 180-day period
To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 to remove barriers to agricultural producers in accessing funds to carry out emergency measures under the emergency conservation program, and for other purposes, section 2, Sec. 2.
Written by .
A 60-day period in paragraph (2) becomes a 180-day period
The document says “is amended”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 2 in the PDF
What the document says
“in paragraph (2), by striking ``60-day'' and inserting ``180-day''”
The change to paragraph (2) of subsection (b). The words "60-day" are struck and the words "180-day" are put in their place. What that period runs for is set by paragraph (2), which is not indexed here, so this entry records the change to the number of days and nothing else.
What the document actually says
“in paragraph (2), by striking ``60-day'' and inserting ``180-day''”
That sentence, in plain words
A time limit in the old law is changed. It said 60 days. Now it says 180 days.
What this is about
This law does not say here what the limit is for. It only makes it longer. A reader has to look at the old law to find out.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act of 2025, Public Law 119-102, sec. 2, 140 Stat. 985 (2026). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ102/html/PLAW-119publ102.htm
This page
“A 60-day period in paragraph (2) becomes a 180-day period,” Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act of 2025, section 2, Sec. 2. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/emergency-conservation-program-improvement-act-2025/proposal/sec02-180-day-period/ (retrieved October 10, 2026).
Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.
How to Read This Page
The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page
number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary,
not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the
quotation rather than replacing it.
