Deals and internal charging decisions are covered
What the document says“(6) Any immunity deals, non-prosecution agreements, plea bargains, or sealed settlements involving Epstein or his associates. (7) Internal DOJ communications, including emails, memos, meeting notes, concerning decisions to charge, not charge, investigate, or decline to investigate Epstein or his associates.”
Paragraphs (6) and (7) of subsection (a). The sixth category is immunity deals, non-prosecution agreements, plea bargains and sealed settlements involving Epstein or his associates. The seventh is internal Department of Justice communications, including emails, memos and meeting notes, concerning decisions to charge, not charge, investigate or decline to investigate Epstein or his associates.
What the document actually says“(6) Any immunity deals, non-prosecution agreements, plea bargains, or sealed settlements involving Epstein or his associates. (7) Internal DOJ communications, including emails, memos, meeting notes, concerning decisions to charge, not charge, investigate, or decline to investigate Epstein or his associates.”
Deals count. That takes in a deal not to charge and a deal to plead guilty. Sealed deals count too. Notes from inside the Justice Department count. That takes in emails and memos about whether to charge.
Lawyers for the government can agree not to bring a case. They write those deals down. They also write notes while they talk it over. Both kinds of paper are covered.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.