The Secretary disapproves redevelopment where it is not appropriate
To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the conditions under which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs is required to redevelop the individualized vocational rehabilitation plan for a veteran, and for other purposes, section 2, Sec. 2.
Written by .
The Secretary disapproves redevelopment where it is not appropriate
The document says “shall”Who acts: Secretary of Veterans AffairsHow: statuteSec. 2 in the PDF
What the document says
“disapprove redevelopment of such plan if the Secretary determines such redevelopment is not appropriate.”
The second branch of the same added paragraph, and the last words of the Act. Where the Secretary determines that redevelopment of the plan is not appropriate, the Secretary disapproves it. The two branches are joined by or, so one of them follows a review. The Act sets no test of what is appropriate and names no route to contest the determination.
What the document actually says
“disapprove redevelopment of such plan if the Secretary determines such redevelopment is not appropriate.”
That sentence, in plain words
The VA can also say no to a new plan. It says no when a new plan is not right.
What this is about
There are just two paths after a check. Write a new plan, or turn one down. The VA picks one of them. The law does not say how to appeal.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page
number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary,
not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the
quotation rather than replacing it.
