$75,000,000 is permanently rescinded from Training and Employment Services
Making further continuing appropriations and other extensions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes, section 3, Sec. 3.
Written by .
$75,000,000 is permanently rescinded from Training and Employment Services
The document says “shall”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 3 in the PDF
What the document says
“$75,000,000 are hereby permanently rescinded from the amount specified in paragraph (2)(A) under such heading for the period October 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025.”
Section 1903 takes back $75,000,000 from funds made available under the Training and Employment Services heading in division D of Public Law 118-47.
What the document actually says
“$75,000,000 are hereby permanently rescinded from the amount specified in paragraph (2)(A) under such heading for the period October 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025.”
That sentence, in plain words
There is $75,000,000 taken back. It covers the budget year 2025.
What this is about
The money paid for job training. It was set aside last year. It cannot be spent now.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025, Public Law 119-4, sec. 3, 139 Stat. 10 (2025). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ4/html/PLAW-119publ4.htm
This page
“$75,000,000 is permanently rescinded from Training and Employment Services,” Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025, section 3, Sec. 3. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/full-year-continuing-appropriations-extensions-act/proposal/sec03-1903-training-rescission/ (retrieved October 10, 2026).
Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.
How to Read This Page
The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page
number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary,
not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the
quotation rather than replacing it.
