Read theMandate

Gerald E. Connolly Esophageal Cancer Awareness Act of 2025 › Section 3

GAO Report

Section 3 · Sec. 3 ·

What this chapter is about

This part asks for a report. A watchdog office for Congress must write it. The report is due one year after the law starts. It must cover two things.

3 proposals indexed from this chapter.

The document says “shallWho acts: Comptroller General of the United StatesHow: statuteSec. 3 in the PDF
What the document says

“Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit a report to Congress”

To require the Government Accountability Office to produce a report on esophageal cancer, and for other purposes, Sec. 3

The operative duty of the Act. The Comptroller General of the United States, who heads the Government Accountability Office, must submit a report to Congress no later than one year after the date of enactment. The Act was approved on June 9, 2026, so the deadline runs from that date. The section then lists the two matters the report must evaluate.

What the document actually says

“Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit a report to Congress”

To require the Government Accountability Office to produce a report on esophageal cancer, and for other purposes, Sec. 3
That sentence, in plain words

The head of a watchdog office must send Congress a report. It is due one year after this law starts.

What this is about

The office checks how the government spends money. Its head is the Comptroller General. The report must cover two things.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Comptroller General of the United StatesHow: statuteSec. 3 in the PDF
What the document says

“the total impact of esophageal cancer-related health care spending under the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program for Federal employees and retirees diagnosed with esophageal cancer”

To require the Government Accountability Office to produce a report on esophageal cancer, and for other purposes, Sec. 3

The first of the two matters the report must evaluate. It reaches spending on care related to esophageal cancer under the health benefits program for federal employees, for both serving employees and retirees who have been diagnosed. The section does not say how the total impact is to be measured.

What the document actually says

“the total impact of esophageal cancer-related health care spending under the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program for Federal employees and retirees diagnosed with esophageal cancer”

To require the Government Accountability Office to produce a report on esophageal cancer, and for other purposes, Sec. 3
That sentence, in plain words

The report must look at what this cancer costs. It must look at care paid for by the health plan for federal workers. That covers workers and retired workers.

What this is about

People who work for the government get health coverage through a big plan. The report must add up what this cancer costs that plan.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Comptroller General of the United StatesHow: statuteSec. 3 in the PDF
What the document says

“how often individuals covered under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program with medical records indicating such individuals are high-risk for esophageal cancer undergo screening according to the established guidelines”

To require the Government Accountability Office to produce a report on esophageal cancer, and for other purposes, Sec. 3

The second of the two matters the report must evaluate. It reaches the frequency of screening among people covered by the program whose medical records indicate they are high risk for esophageal cancer, measured against what the section calls the established guidelines. The section does not name a guideline.

What the document actually says

“how often individuals covered under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program with medical records indicating such individuals are high-risk for esophageal cancer undergo screening according to the established guidelines”

To require the Government Accountability Office to produce a report on esophageal cancer, and for other purposes, Sec. 3
That sentence, in plain words

The report must also count how often people get checked. It counts people in that same health plan. It counts those whose records show a high risk.

What this is about

Doctors have rules about who should get checked. The report must see how often those checks happen.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

What This Page Covers, and What It Leaves Out

The duty the section places on the Comptroller General, its deadline, and each of the two matters the report must evaluate.

Nothing in the section is left out. The section is the operative section of the Act and runs to one sentence with two paragraphs.

The section names the health benefits program for federal employees but does not set out what it covers, and the statute establishing that program is not indexed here. It also refers to screening according to the established guidelines without naming a guideline; section 2 recites a recommendation attributed to the American Gastroenterological Association as of December 2022, and the section does not say whether that is the guideline meant. The section spells the program "Federal Employee Health Benefits Program" in the first paragraph and "Federal Employees Health Benefits Program" in the second, and the quotations reproduce each as printed.