A denial must be explained in writing within 30 days
What the document says“not later than 30 days after the date of such denial, the regulator shall provide the applicant with written notice explaining the denial with specificity, including all findings made by the regulator with respect to all identified material shortcomings in the application, including actionable recommendations on how the applicant could address the identified material shortcomings.”
Subsection (d)(2)(B). Three things go in the notice: the explanation with specificity, all findings on identified material shortcomings, and actionable recommendations on how those shortcomings could be addressed.
What the document actually says“not later than 30 days after the date of such denial, the regulator shall provide the applicant with written notice explaining the denial with specificity, including all findings made by the regulator with respect to all identified material shortcomings in the application, including actionable recommendations on how the applicant could address the identified material shortcomings.”
A no must come in writing within 30 days. It must say just what was wrong. It must also say how the firm could fix it.
The watchdog must list what it found. Vague reasons are not enough. The advice has to be something the firm can act on.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.