A regulator must examine an issuer and assess three things
What the document says“The appropriate primary Federal payment stablecoin regulator shall examine a permitted payment stablecoin issuer described in paragraph (1) in order to assess-- (A) the nature of the operations and financial condition of the permitted payment stablecoin issuer”
Subsection (a)(3). The examination assesses the nature of the issuer's operations and financial condition, the financial, operational, technological and other risks within the issuer that may threaten its own safety and soundness or the stability of the financial system of the United States, and the issuer's systems for monitoring and controlling those risks.
What the document actually says“The appropriate primary Federal payment stablecoin regulator shall examine a permitted payment stablecoin issuer described in paragraph (1) in order to assess-- (A) the nature of the operations and financial condition of the permitted payment stablecoin issuer”
The watchdog must check the maker itself. It looks at what the firm does. It looks at how the firm stands with money.
It also looks for risks in the firm. Some risks could sink the firm. Some could hurt the wider system. It checks how the firm tracks them.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.